Respect The Contract

Yes, expectedly, you (in plural) here have called me out on my incessant upbraiding of the government of the day, asking that some of the mudslinging (if it's really so considered) should be hauled at the sponsors of terrorism and the terrorists themselves. I can identify with your pain (if such emotions truly exist) in how true some of the colours I've had to paint this administration in have come to light and have reflected poorly in your premises for being on the side of government. However, your penchant for dodging the real issues seems to be impervious of any curative measures. It seems you always need to be reminded of pertinent issues that no shouting match can silent. Well, here is more.

I remember what this same government you seem to be defending with all your might did when Jonathan's cousin was kidnapped in Bayelsa. The military personnel deployed evoked a Nigeria-at-war sentiment. The sheer number of Armoured Personnel Carriers engaged in trying to rescue one man was benumbing. They combed the entire area like fine hair and made sure that in no time the privileged cousin was back to the warm embrace of his family. Why was it so important then and not so now? Well, he was a close relative of the powers that be and as such, no expense was spared to get him and safely too.

But these girls? Who are they related to? Nobodies. Bloody civilians. They can roast for all this administration cares. Our military, given the right morale boosting, is worthy of great endeavours. But not when there is more politics at play than the fate of hapless children not priviledged enough to be from the political royalty. Not worthy enough to even have their parents consoled by the top echelon of political jobbers (until their hands were forced).

We did not elect Boko Haram for our welfare and safety. So, we don't point fingers at them. They are not answerable to us. So, we don't join issues with them. This government took upon itself that duty and responsibility and in so far as we play our part in paying their salaries and spending so much to make them comfortable enough to do their jobs (darn too much, more than enough), they pretty much must do it.

Underline the word MUST.

That is the social contract that binds us together and as clearly spelt out in the Constitution, the first priority of the government is the welfare of the citizenry. Don't let that escape your consideration.

(The YOUs know themselves)

When Will The 1st Citizen Do "Freedom"?

Nigeria has gifted mankind with a new category of leadership. It's craftsmanship at its most idealistic. They call it APPRENTICE PRESIDENCY.

Its most obvious pointer can be referenced from the saying, "Jonathan dey try." This kind is mastered by the apologists of the incumbent (not only of the presidency, mind you - only that the latter is a more conspicuous target and thus has more of such atrocious comments made to hem in criticisms) and brandished to quell any upbraiding that naturally ought to be levelled against such crass blockheadedness that has been a characteristic feature of this administration. Saying it is kindergarten was putting kindergartens in a very bad light. Had I been running one, I could have sued Chief Akande for such mudslinging.

However, should we stoop so low as to accept his apprenticeship, the obvious follow-up question will be, "When is he due for FREEDOM?" Abi, won't he graduate?