Sunday, November 22, 2015
Midnight Run
Hello Microsoft, listen.
Friday, November 20, 2015
Carcases of truth
Even if soldiers died in the defence of the country, why, for all that's good, do you want to use it to gain political advantage so much so that you dig up an old picture to share for the easily deceived to broadcast across the social media as evidence of their demise? To what end? Whip up more sentiments of disfavour that dovetails with your avowed hatred of anything that speaks for the current government?
In the fight against terrorism, internal divisions only perpetuates the conditions that allow the ideology to productively fester and persist for longer. Added to the "them" versus "us" mantra, and we have the vital mixture that energises the terrorist movement.
Let us even admit that soldiers "vanished", presumably to their deaths (for, in truth, there's a dearth of truth in reports these days). Is spreading the questionably purported image of their burnt carcases the right reaction? To shame the army to submission?
Seriously?
Tuesday, November 17, 2015
The Pursuit. The Efforts. The Goal.
You expend effort on a project so much that it takes its toll on you. People notice. It's that bad. They advise you to take it easy next time. You take it to heart while awaiting the result of your toiling.
Then, it turns out you exceeded expectations. The results show you excelled tremendously. You were among the best.
Thrilled beyond measure, you pat yourself on the back. You nod to the accolades. You bow to the applause. Consciously or unconsciously you accept the fact that giving it your all has its purposes. You discard the counsel to ever take things easy. You shred the thought of partial or incremental effort.
As you soak in the exhilaration of success, you accept that there will be sleepless nights ahead. And you embrace that acceptance while highlighting your next goals.
#TeamNoSleep
Sunday, November 15, 2015
Life, ooh life
It all comes down to basic, simple values. Life has no intrinsic colour nor tribe. Not even a nationality. It isn't inherently Maidugurian or Courcourounnesian. It is just LIFE. Humanitarian principles that urge global intervention to the point of contravening another nation's sovereignty are based on this underlying consensus. Life is to be prioritised above all other concerns and differences. When reduced to the basest, that is our shared commonality and it means the same thing everywhere.
But that is clearly an assumption.
When its loss in one part of the globe carries little to no significance in contrasting comparison to global reaction to its loss elsewhere, an oft-neglected issue of significance returns to the debate. Are some lives more important, are some lives of more value than others?
We may have to agree that they are. There is something of geolocation that places an extra veneer of importance to one life somewhere but not to several hundreds, nay thousands, elsewhere. It has nothing to do with the character of the one who loses his or her right to life. It isn't related to the person's innocence either. It's just about where you are in the world. Probably also about which passport has your name on it too. It is about how bad your government is. Or better still, how insensitive your countrymen and women are (that is why little importance is placed on collateral damage in warfare, yea?)
It is on these accidents (these qualities and characteristics of differentiation) rather than the substance of your essence as a human person that hang the value of your life. And since these characteristics of differentiation are unwholesome in that part of the world where you exist, shea butter (that fat extracted from the nut of the African shea tree) is of more value than your life.
It doesn't matter the content of your character nor the moral reticence of your upbringing. Your life is forfeit. If you like bi masquerade or bi defender of the Western weltanschauung, na di same thing. Whether your unfortunate passing gets a mention in the news or not is beside the point. The value on your life just didn't measure up. Finish.
Next time, please endeavour to be conceived and born in a better location. Because principles aren't all they're made to be. They are coloured by a prism of other realities; of bad governance, of uncaring countrymen, of socioeconomic paralysis, of moral somersaults, of nationalistic self interests and of religious jingoism. Those and many more determine how low or high a value is attributed to your life.
Ooh, and don't forget a better passport too. You'd thank me later.
Footnote
There is also the difference losing someone brings to the picture. When you meet those who have endured loss and whose sense of belonging are shaken by the strangeness of the coldness of their own countrymen to their predicament (whilst identifying with similar foreign losses), it strikes you. A reaction to loss of any life is only human. The deeper and closer it is to heart, the more emotional. It, no doubt, helps the bereaved as your solidarity helps with their fortitude.
I decline to define what a selective reaction to loss of life makes one. And the effects on the selectively neglected bereaved. I might go overboard as usual.
Wednesday, November 11, 2015
One More Apology In A Season Of Anomie
I want to write an apology. With a twist. It will not be on my behalf.
Rather, it will be on behalf of whoever it is that should have been tasked with the responsibility to apologise to those who felt the need to be Defenders of the 16-Year-Rule. For ease of use, let us apply D16YR to the collective as an abbreviation.
It may be justified to clarify the need for this apology. And worth it to do so as well.
The cabal, in the purest form of that term, largely responsible for the period under review recently put forward two salient issues. One was an "unreserved apology" for mistakes it made during the period. Finger-pointing of witch-hunting was the other.
(I'd go as far as saying that by persisting in pointing fingers at the others as being causative of some or most of your problems is indicative of an obdurate insistence in not internalising the outward confession of guilt and ipso facto renders the desired absolution anaemic. But I digress).
Yes. Back to subject of apology.
It shouldn't be hastily concluded that the dramatis personae, who accepted that some form of acceptance of culpability was necessary, are admitting they are directly or indirectly responsible for the decrepit malfeasance that has taken this government so much time to get its acts together. HOW ON EARTH!!!!!!
Any such admission will reverse the ditzy ebbtide of blame-throwing for which their ebullient spokesman has become accustomed. Far be it from them that they allow that happenstance be.
Therefore, the apology wasn't to claim ownership of steering the Nigerian ship well-nigh the Rubicon. Lai lai. Rather, it was to assuage the bruised egos of aggrieved party members. It may have come to the cabal's notice that some of the latter, feeling hard done and dealt with an unfair hand, may have craftily engineered a counter campaign that led to the unprecedented triumph of the opposition.
As results are being overturned across the country, this motley assortment of strange bedfellows, united only by a resolve to consolidate on their distasteful and corruptly-enriched nests, have been jolted to action. In their meticulous stratagem, the initial port of call is an apology. It is, for all intents and purposes, brilliant.
But, honest? I'd not be as generous to inveigh that it is. It stops short. There are those who hold a standard for honest apology. It goes through all the acts of being sorry and exhibiting resolve to desist likewise in future. That isn't what this is about. This concerns accepting the consequences of your errors.
Merely apologising doesn't cut it.
That brings me back to the earlier point of my digression. There were deeply grievous ills to the nation state as a result of the mistakes the cabal is apologising for. The damage to the country's status within and outside the continent is immeasurable. The pile of filth runs through every fibre of governance, public and private. There were monies drained from the Commonwealth that may never be recovered. The economy haemorrhaged. And the worst? People died. They are still dying.
During all these we were sold the dummy of ratings. World class economists were at the helm so what could go wrong? The obscene morassy foulness was buried under a sheen of a resplendent agenda while peanuts were unevenly redistributed to keep a hungry but characteristically otiose army of Defenders at work.
And now, what? A bodacious attempt at salvation with a piteous attempt at apology. And a whining about not having to pay for recognisable mistakes.
Short of going into how one was accused of expressions of hate when pointing out a fraction of the mistakes being owned now by the cabal, it is enough of the frontispiece to clearly place the backdrop in stark relief - why I think as a result of all these, there is one more apology to write.
The apology-penners must of needs apologise to the Defenders of the 16 Year-Rule. These were Nigerians who were adamantly beholden to the defense of the misdeeds of that bloc even to their besotted detriment. By night and day, they stood resolute, defiantly at war, vocally and otherwise, with any informed or ignorant critic of the period under review. They stoutly argued that given our circumstances, we were having the best time of our lives. For them, the mistake of today was the best president the country could ask for. And it was the height of stupidity to think otherwise.
Why, now, is it thought that this admirable patriotic soldiers aren't worthy of an apology? With the unquantifiable efforts they invested in maintaining the illusion of good governance? That is ungodly. In its mildest terms, it is inhumanely ingratiating to not express some or any sort of apologia to them that clearly states the cabal's regret at the wild geese pursuit of the D16YR.
It is for the sake of this gross oversight that I have taken it upon myself to say these heartfelt words. It is no mean feat to bring myself to this but I think it behooves on responsible citizens to do responsible acts. I don't take those previous attacks on my person, by those to whom I tender this apology, to heart. You were doing what you considered best at the time with the information available to you. And don't think you don't deserve this apology, please. Don't belittle yourself. You, a D16YR, deserve more.
I AM SORRY. For you.
Friday, November 6, 2015
Itchiness
Itchiness
This itch has no cure.
It spreads.
It evokes public and private scratching.
It worsens the sufferer's discomfiture.
This itch is damnation.
Odd places.
No victim can hide it.
It will not permit.
All must know.
This itch has nary a thought for others.
Odd body parts.
It blights.
It victimises.
This itch MUST itch.
This itch that he must fail so that I can boastfully shame "the others" with the pidgin chants of "I no talk am", "shebi, no be wetin I talk" and the English variant "I told you so".
That itch itches.
Scratch it.
Let the country fall for all you care.
That itch itches.
Scratch it.